Mystrika
InnoSource is a leader in contact center recruiting, headquartered in Columbus, Ohio with five regional offices across the United States. The agency focuses on contract staffing for technical support and contact centers, as well as on-site outsourcing or managed services for entire business departments.
InnoSource, founded in 1988, is a contact center recruiting leader headquartered in Dublin, Ohio, with five regional offices across the United States. The agency specializes in contract staffing for technical support and contact centers, as well as on-site outsourcing or managed services for entire business departments. InnoSource uses a recruit-to-order process for every position, matching candidates based on skill and culture fit.
The agency employs between 100 and 249 people and charges an average hourly rate of $50, with a minimum budget listed as "Inquire." InnoSource has been placing top candidates into rewarding careers for over three decades, working with clients and candidates nationwide.
InnoSource offers HR outsourcing and business consulting services, with expertise in HR consulting, recruiting, and staffing. The agency serves a variety of client types, including startups, and has experience across manufacturing, healthcare, and IT industries. Photos of the agency's work are available on its DesignRush profile.
Google reviews give InnoSource a 3.2 rating based on 115 reviews. Feedback is mixed: some candidates describe supportive recruiters and successful placements, while others report poor communication, scheduling confusion, and concerns about age discrimination. The agency has not provided specific portfolio results on its profile.
Services
- HR Outsourcing
- Business Consulting
Industries Served
Team Size
Pros
- Supportive recruiters who provide timely communication and guidance
- Recruit-to-order process tailored to skill and culture fit
Cons
- Some candidates report poor communication and scheduling issues leading to missed interviews
Client Review Analysis
Mixed reviews; some candidates praise supportive recruiters and successful placements, while others cite poor communication, scheduling confusion, and perceived age discrimination.